Spiritis Church/Holy Spirit

 [ Contact Us ] [ Site Map ] [ Search ] [ Links ] [ Ministers' Web ]

The True Original Church
From the Original Ministry of Jesus & His Apostles

 

History of Spiritis Church

Join our online Fellowship
No cost, obligation or "strings"

 
 
 



View & sign our Guestbook

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Prev. ] Next ]

The Book: HISTORY OF THE TRUE ORIGINAL CHURCH
("The History of Spiritis Church")
 
click HERE for optional FULL PDF version

Introduction | The Way | The Apostolic Movement | Constantine & The Council of Nicea | The Tree & The Branches | Spiritis Church | Apostolic Successions of Spiritis Church


Bishop Glenda Green, D.D.By Bishop Glenda Green, D.D.
with Archbishop Larry Jensen, D.D., Ph.D.

Introduction 
It is with great humility, in respect of this true privilege, that I present the history of Spiritis Church. For in so doing, I am presenting evidence of the Original Church of Jesus and the Apostles continuing to spread in yet another generation. This is a story as old as the faith itself, moving through history in unbroken succession, one person at a time. This is not the story of institutional hierarchy and doctrine, although both of those powers were also important in shaping Christianity as we know it today. This is essentially the story of how the Jesus fellowship, known in his lifetime and for a generation beyond as "The Way" (or Ortha in Aramaic) moved through history under the power of the Holy Spirit and Love regardless of - and often in spite of - institutional organization and issues of doctrine.

I was once asked by one of our seminary candidates why I wanted to "found" a new church at a time when religious conflicts were reaching a fever pitch and enlightenment had demonstrated that faith was the greater power over organization anyway. Stunned for a moment by her unexpected question, I paused to examine the truth of my position. Just as quickly I surprised myself with the answer. "I did not found a church. The Church "found" me!" Were this not the case, and were it not for the splendid education and guidance of Bishop Lee Petersen and Bishop Larry Jensen I would not be in this position of furthering an ancient and eternal work.

Even though I have been blessed with a sacred visitation by Jesus Christ on more than one occasion, and the anointing of the Holy Spirit many times, it would not have been my choice to serve their will through organized religious venues. Until the time that I was chosen for inclusion in the original apostolic movement I had envisioned my service to be loosely and specifically under the guidance of Love alone. Even when I was first invited to accept an Apostolic Vicarage to protect the new messages of Jesus, I accepted only out of respect for the honor that was being paid to the labors of my heart. I also reasoned that by way of fellowship with others of similar dedication I would receive support and perhaps a tempering discipline that could only strengthen my service. Otherwise, I would have continued as before, with a spirit of freedom under the guidance of Love. Little did I know at the time that this is exactly what Jesus originally ordained? Through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, I had been lifted into "The Way" and not consciously realized it.

When Jesus said to His Apostles, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to every creature," he released them from all confining structures and commissioned them to serve with the utmost compassion, tolerance, and acceptance everywhere. This is a radical concept even now, but imagine the impact of such an instruction at a time when "The Way" was thought to be just another sect within Judaism! What happened in the succeeding 2000 years is a marvel and a miracle. Not every act within every chapter is something to be proud of, but the extraordinary victory of a small group of believers has changed the world. Not only did this faith surmount opposition from external forces, but also it resisted and survived the internal domination of corrupting structures. When Jesus said, "You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free," he was referring most intimately to the future destiny of his own following.

The triumph of Christianity has immense historical significance. It began with a small group of faithful men and women from the back waters of the Roman Empire and expanded so vigorously in three centuries that their beliefs permeated the whole Empire and somehow become the official religion. In fact, by the end of the 4th century, it was the only tolerated religion of the Roman Empire! That is a truly remarkable phenomenon. How it happened is not clearly known but is definitely a miracle of perseverance. We can clearly identify various stages on the path of Christianity, as it moved toward its ultimate victory. In its first stage, Christianity begins not as a religion, but as a movement of people around the man we call Jesus - a single charismatic teacher. He offered a love-directed, egalitarian worldview at a time in Jewish history when unification was imperative if destruction was to be avoided. Those who followed him had often had different opinions about who he was, but we know that he was generally regarded as a holy man by those who assembled in crowds to hear him speak or receive healing.

[ Index }


The Way
In the New Testament stories, it is clearly revealed that Jesus was preparing his disciples for a level of leadership and spiritual knowledge that was not yet revealed to the throngs of people who crowded to hear him speak. In one particularly direct statement, Jesus is quoted as saying, “Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables.” (Mark 4:11)  Jesus was teaching within a Jewish context having ancient laws, teachings, and prophecies, a new way to spiritual fulfillment and to reunion with God.  He had no intention of changing that foundation, but rather of fulfilling it through providing an expanded understanding and more compassionate applications of it to life.  As his teachings gained more notice and his followers became more cohesive, this new power being unleashed first emerged as a sect within Judaism known as “The Way” or Ortha in Aramaic, the language that Jesus and his followers spoke. 

The arrest and crucifixion of Jesus had a terrifying impact on his followers — especially the inner circle of Apostles.  But of greater importance was the miracle of revelation that the resurrection gave them.  He appeared to them over a period of forty days and spoke about the kingdom of God.  On one occasion, while he was eating with them, he gave this command:  “Do not leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift my Father promised, which you have heard me speak about.  For John baptized with water, but in a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.” With their typical worldly orientation, they asked him: “Will the kingdom of Israel be restored at this time?”  He said to them, “It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.  But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you.  And you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and all Judea and Samaria and to the ends of the earth.”  Upon saying this, he ascended into Heaven.  The Apostles walked back to Jerusalem, spending much time together in prayer to strengthen their unity.  But overall, they were despondent with the loss of their beloved leader and somewhat unfocused.  Jesus had taught them “a way” of living and worshipping, of valuing and serving, but after his apparent departure there was a great slack in the line, and they were sad.   The apostles remained together as instructed, along with the women beloved of Jesus and his family.  Then a miraculous event happened on the feast day of Pentecost, an agricultural festival celebrating and giving thanks for the "first fruits" of the early spring harvest.  On that day, some fifty days after the Resurrection, the faithful in Jesus received the baptism of Holy Spirit as Jesus had promised. Through the fulfilling of his covenant, the First Church was born.  This story may be found in the Book of Acts, Chapter 2.  It reads as follows:

  1. When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place.

  2. Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting.

  3. They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them.

  4. All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in tongues as the Spirit enabled them.

  5. Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven.

  6. When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. 

  7. Utterly amazed, they asked: Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans?

  8. Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language?

  9. Parthians and Medes and Elamites and those who live in Bet Nahrein, Judeans and Cappodocians and from the country of Pontus and Asia,

  10. And from the country of Phrygia and Pamphylia and Egypt and the countries of Libyans that are neighbors of Cyrenia, and those that came from Rome, Jews and adherents.

  11. And those from Crete and Arabia, behold, we heard them speaking in our language, wonders of God!

  12. Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, “What does this mean?”

  13. Others, however, laughed at them, as they said, "They have had too much wine."

  14. Then Peter stood up with the Eleven, raised his voice and addressed the crowd:  “Fellow Jews and all of you, who live in Jerusalem, let me explain this to you; listen carefully to what I say. 

  15. These men are not drunk, as you suppose. It’s only nine in the morning!

  16. No, this is what the prophet Joel spoke: 

  17. ‘In the last days,’ God says, ‘I will pour out my spirit on all people.  Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams. 

  18. Even on my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days, and they will prophesy.

By the power of the Holy Spirit, on Pentecost the First Church was born.  This was about ten days after the ascension of Jesus.  The event was so profound, and those who experienced it were so ecstatic that 3,000 more people were baptized and added to the followers of Jesus that day.  In this manner, the Church of The Holy Spirit (Spiritus Sancti) was established. This is the Church that would spread throughout the world.  It would diversify greatly in the nature of service, acceptance, and inclusion.  But two things were ever constant: there was reverence for the Holy Spirit, and all the sacraments that conveyed its presence and redeeming power.   The love expressed and taught by Jesus was central to the message, which was retold endlessly in the stories of his life and resurrection.  Though there was no official organization of the Church at this time, the Power behind it was known by all, and the remembrance of this Power threads its way through all the sacraments celebrated through all the ages: It was the Church of Spiritus Sancti, which is Latin for Holy Spirit.

 

Christianity did not start out as a unified movement. We have to remember that the disciples were probably dispersed at the very beginning.   That was at a time before they knew themselves as Christians, before there were any fixed ideas about what Christian beliefs or rituals should be.  There were no uniform requirements even about their perceptions of Jesus or what they should tell others about him. The sources that we have tell us that Christianity started as a multiform process, and the Church adapted as it moved into very different cultural and language contexts.  In the first century we would be more correct to call it the Jesus movement.  In the early days after his departure, the teaching began to organize and reorganize around his memory.  The central theme was the resurrection.  That profound miracle seems to have spread very quickly among his followers, but the earliest form of that movement was still thoroughly a sect within Judaism. He was a Jewish Messiah. They were followers of a Jewish apocalyptic tradition, and they were expecting the coming of the kingdom of God on earth. 

 

The earliest congregations were probably small sectarian groups. At least one of them seems to be based in Jerusalem, and there were others as well spread throughout the countryside.  In all probability there's at least one or more in the Galilee.  It is reasonable to believe that the earliest gatherings of people to celebrate Jesus’ memory and practice his teachings were really small pockets of communal support all focused on this identity of Jesus as the Messiah and the healing power of the Holy Spirit. 

 

It's hard to know in all the cases who the earliest group members were. We know a few names largely from the New Testament itself.  In Jerusalem, James the brother of Jesus seems to have been the leader. There was a woman by the name of Mary in the Jerusalem congregation as well as Peter and some of the other original apostles of Jesus.   Beyond that we know very few names. There were just small conclaves of people holding on tightly to their new beliefs and expectations while at the same time continuing in their Jewish tradition. The Jesus movement was at first a sect, and sects have an interesting behavior pattern. One of the things they must do is to distinguish themselves from their dominant cultural environment while remaining to some degree part of it.  A sect always arises within a community with whom it shares a basic set of beliefs, and yet it needs to find some mechanism for identifying itself as different. The tension that arose from that was manifested in a variety of ways.  There were controversies over belief and practice such as different ideas of purity and piety. But, another manifestation of tension was a restlessness and zeal to spread the message out, to hit the road, and to convince others that their version of the truth was better. What we would call evangelists today were called in those days "wandering charismatics," traveling preachers and prophets who continued vigorously proclaiming that the kingdom of heaven was at hand, apparently continuing the legacy of Jesus' own preaching. They traveled around without money or extra clothes, performing miracles and healing the sick for free.  They apparently begged for food or expected the charity of those who received them. This is a different picture than what we've come to expect from the pages of the New Testament and yet, it's within the tradition itself.  Even Paul reports that he encountered people who came from Judea with a different kind of gospel message.  Variety—not conformity—was the typical presence of early Christianity. 

 

This runs contrary to the view that mainstream Christianity has always, understandably, wanted to convey. That is, at the beginning there was only clarity and conformity of belief—that only gradually, under outside influences, did heresies arise and conflict emerge.  One of the most challenging aspects of modern historical scholarship is precisely that easy answers elude us. The harder we work to determine the first moment when Christianity was unified and everything was clear, the more we must realize that the only true unity the Church has ever known is the person of Jesus Christ himself and the power of the Holy Spirit.

 

“The Way” was propagated through the service of love and development of communities with a strong will to find liberation and deliverance from Roman oppression.  The voice of freedom would always be strong within it.  This desire for liberation and the spirit of caring seemed to defy conformity.  On the contrary it created a turn of heart and mind infinitely adaptable to the many cultures it would enter and infuse with its spirit.

 

Invisibility was the greatest ally of the early congregations, a sense of community was their greatest strength, and conviction in deliverance was their driving force.  Therefore, “The Way” had little need for naming itself, and congregations rarely considered their collective unit to be a “church.”  They were united in Spirit — Spiritus Sancti — but the congregations would not commonly refer to themselves as “Christians” until after the burning of Jerusalem by Rome in 70 AD.  “The Way” was a sect within Judaism, and it considered its greatest value to be the fulfillment of messianic prophecy.  For this reason, it upheld the greater good of Israel.

 

Ironically, the catastrophic destruction of Jerusalem created a new opportunity. For a short while, it was safer to be a “Christian” than a Jew!  There was a need for distancing and protection, and it was in this pursuit that congregations first began to use openly the word Christian.  But, I am moving ahead of the story.  To understand the origins of the word “Christian” and its full impact, we need to first look at the contributions of Paul and the Apostolic movement in general.

[ Index }


The Apostolic Movement
The first Christian fellowships put a great emphasis upon unity amongst one another, yet the odd thing is they seemed always to have been squabbling over what kind of unity they were to have. The oldest authentic documents we have concerning their beliefs, customs, and struggles are Paul’s letters.  In these letters, he is frequently defending himself against some other messenger of the faith who has refuted his message, saying, “No, Paul didn’t tell it right. We have now to tell you the real thing.” So, it is clear from the very beginning, that there are different ways of interpreting the fundamental message. There are different kinds of practice, with many arguments over how “Jewish” are they to be; how “Greek” are they to be; how do they adapt to and penetrate the surrounding culture?  There were also no uniform answers about the real meaning of Jesus death; was the resurrection in body or spirit only; what teachings of Jesus were most important, and what did they mean?

 

Paul's conversion as an Apostle may date as early as three years after Jesus' death, and no later than the year 35. He was in Damascus when he was called, according to his own witness. So it looks like there are already, within two to five years after Jesus' death, Greek speaking congregations outside of Palestine, and very early in Antioch.  There were also very early communities in Samaria and Galilee.

 

The Apostle Paul is, next to Jesus, the most intriguing figure of the 1st century of Christianity, and far better known historically than Jesus because of his many letters that have survived as primary documents of the era.  There are many astonishing things about him.  Paul's mission carried Christianity through Asia Minor, and present-day Turkey, into Macedonia, and Greece, and before his life was over into Rome (although he did not found the Church of Rome). In his own time, he saw himself primarily as a prophet to the non-Jews, to bring to them the message of the crucified Messiah, and he does this in an extraordinary way.  This is especially interesting because he began his career as one of the highest Jewish authorities. His impact has resounded throughout the history of Christianity through his writings which comprise about two-thirds of the New Testament.

 

In the writings of Paul we see for the first time the language that will become the hallmark of all the later Christian tradition. Indeed this is where we get much of the vocabulary that makes Christianity distinctive. The term "Christ" is a title. It's the Greek translation of the Hebrew word Messioc and they both mean exactly the same thing. They both refer to someone who is anointed. The term is identifying Jesus as a religious figure in a new way.

 

For Paul, however, the term "Christ" does not automatically signal a Christian frame of reference that everyone today would have recognized. The term Christ, Messiah, could have been used by any number of different Jewish people and still meant different things. So just to hear that term, even in the Syrian city of Antioch, probably wasn't all that unique, and yet it must have sparked some interest. It is significant therefore that the Book of Acts tells us that the term “Christian” (which meant Christ’s men) was first coined in Antioch as a reference to the Apostle Paul and St. Barnabas, who were indeed Christ’s men. This could have been as much as ten years after the death of Jesus.

 

It is good to remember, however, that while we think of the term Christian in lofty and positive terms, at the time that it was coined it was probably a slur. It was probably thrown at these early followers of Jesus as some derogatory designation of them.  It is typical with any new religious movement that the insiders may have their own self identity, while those outside label them with another term designed to exclude and repel. So when we hear at Antioch that they are called "Christians" we have to think of that more in the vein of them being called "Messianists" or "Christies."

 

But Paul had his opponents — sometimes from the leaders of the Jerusalem church led by James the brother of Jesus.  With great concern they cautioned the congregation of Galatia. "Wait a minute, Paul told you a very simplified gospel that makes it easy for you to become a member of this new group.  But we know, after all, that if you're really going to be a real Christian, you first have to be a real Jew and that means, you have to be circumcised and you have to keep dietary regulations of the Torah.” And Paul would reply, "No, you don't understand how radically new this thing is, which God is doing here." 

 

Paul commands with unprecedented authority this Jewish school, this Jewish philosophy, this Jewish sect, and declares that its teachings are so important that the entire map of the world needs to be redrawn.  As this happens the simple dichotomy of Jews and gentiles fades away and we no longer simply have a Jewish school arguing with other Jews about interpretations of law and theology. We now have a new map of the world. The teachings of Jesus have within them the secret to understanding the new cosmic order. The old distinctions between Jews and gentiles are now obliterated. That distinction has been supplanted by a new, more wonderful and beautiful idea in which we have a new Israel that will now embrace both Jews and gentiles.  Through those who accepted the new covenant and the new faith we can see the beginnings of what might be called the emergence of Christianity as distinct from Judaism.

 

For some Christians, this never happens. They can't bring themselves to say that God has thoroughly redrawn the map of the cosmos and has taken them out of the Jewish world and pushed them onto the stage of history. Others disagree with Paul on exactly how to read this new map and exactly what it means, and most importantly, where do the Jews fit in now, those Jews who are "being left behind."... But, in any case, the Christian Church itself was now emerging as a new independent group by the middle of the 2nd century. 

 

With this explosive spread of Christian churches it cannot be expected that everywhere, everybody was doing and believing the same thing, singing the same hymns and reading the same scriptures and telling the same story. So we have a beginning with great diversity, and the slow process, particularly in the second century, to establish a greater unity among the very diverse churches. Developing unity was already a process in Paul's church.  In fact that was his main motivation for writing letters, to insure that these newly converted Christians in Ephesus and Philippi and Thessaloniki and in Corinth have some unanimity in their beliefs. 

 

Christianity, or one would rather say "Christianities," of the second and third centuries were a highly variegated phenomenon. We really can't imagine Christianity as a unified coherent religious movement. Certainly there were some religious organizations. There were institutions developing in some Christian churches, but only in some. And, this was not universal by any means. We know from the literature recovered at Nag Hammadi, Egypt, that gnostic Christianity did not have the kind of clear hierarchy that other forms of Christianity had developed. They still clung to a charismatic leadership model. 

 

There were also very different views of Jesus in the various types of Christianity.  Perhaps the starkest contrast was among those who considered themselves as gnostic Christians, and those who considered themselves Christians in the old Pauline view of things. On the one hand, Paul, and Pauline Christianity, would have placed all of the emphasis on Jesus' death and resurrection, and the saving power of that death and resurrection. Gnostic Christianity, on the other hand, would have placed its prime emphasis on the message, the wisdom, the knowledge, the gnosis (which means ‘knowledge’ in Greek)—the knowledge that Jesus transmits, and even the secret knowledge that Jesus transmits. So one would have on the one hand faith in the saving event of Jesus' life and death, and on the other hand knowledge as the great source of adherence to the Jesus movement on the other hand. 

 

The second century was the age of definition before Christianity. Now that it realized it no longer was Judaism, or no longer was a form of Judaism it had to figure out well then, what is it exactly? What is Christianity? What makes it not Judaism? How is it able hold on somehow to the Jewish Scriptures (the Old Testament), and still not be Judaism? This was one of the major questions confronting Christian thinkers, writers, and Church leaders of the second century. This was the great age of Christian diversity, sects, schools, and “heresies” of all kinds.  It was only in the second century that we begin to see the emergence of what might be called orthodoxy, or something that might simply be called "Christianity" in a kind of uniform body of doctrines and text, that is to say the New Testament. The New Testament as a collection of texts is a product of the second century, as Church leaders decided which books were sacred, which books were authoritative and which ones were not.

 

By the third century of our era, we have something called Christianity with its own sacred books, its own rituals, its own ideas.  But this is also the great age of confrontation with the Roman Empire. The third century was the great age of persecutions. The Roman Empire wakes up to realize that there is something new afoot, and from their perspective, sinister, in new groups that are threatening the social order and ultimately the political order of the Empire.  And, the Roman Empire was correct. The Romans correctly intuited that the victory of Christianity would mean the end of the Roman Empire, the end of the classical world.  When we think of persecution we see it, of course, from a Christian perspective. We see it as heroic martyrs confronting the might of Rome. The martyrs are indeed a spectacle of tragic devotion. Their sacrifices were magnificent demonstrations of Christian faith. On the other side of the coin, however, we must realize that the Roman Empire was doing what all bureaucracies do. It was trying to protect and to perpetuate itself.

 

The Romans tried to suppress Christianity but failed by such a staggering measure that in the fourth century, Christianity has become the state religion.  By the end of the fourth century the newly official Christian Church of Rome is persecuting all non-Christian groups in the Empire! By the end of the fourth century it was illegal to practice any form of public worship other than Christianity in the entire Roman Empire. There is a great mystery here.  How could there have been such an extraordinary reversal?  Jesus was executed by the Romans as a public criminal and a threat to their way of life. Yet three centuries later he is being hailed as a God, as part of the one true God, who is the God of the new Christian Roman Empire. That is a remarkable progression of possibilities, an astonishing development in the course of three centuries.  It’s hard to understand exactly how it happened or why it happened that way, but it is important to realize that Christianity of the fourth century is not the same as the Jesus movement of the first or even the second century.

 

This of course takes place gradually. It doesn’t happen everywhere all at once, in the same way. It’s a complex protracted process that must allow for variety. Early Christianity, by moving into different cultures, different universes of thought and religion in the ancient world also adopted numerous concepts from other religions, which enriched the early Christian movement tremendously.

[ Index }


Constantine & The Council of Nicea
The transformation of Christianity over the first 325 years of its existence is really a profound one. The one who started out as a messianic claimant, or a religious-political rebel, a victim of the Pax Romana, had by the time of the conversion of Constantine established the official religion of the Roman Empire. Even then, that’s not a simple transformation. It would take another hundred years before most of the Roman world really converted to Christianity. But still, with the conversion of Constantine, it w